Shouldn't we split this into two pages, since two different Biobliterators existed in the game with different functions and abilities?

No Offense 9:43 PM August 3, 2013 (UTC)

  • Possibly. I'll check the strategy guide and see how it's covered there. --Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 01:46, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • I think they should stay in one article. They are both called Biobliterator. The later version is an improved one but I think it's more appropriate to keep them on the same page in this case. It just simply needs a sub-section about the improved version. Also notably from the strategy guide "a swarm of Biobliterators swept over the city" of Metropolis. --Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 15:55, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

I think thats a plot hole (or a typo of sorts) with them stating they're "swarms" of Biobliterators, when really their was only one Biobliterator in use, while another one was under construction in secret. Plus, not only does the second Biobliterator's biobliterating abilities greatly enhanced, but its also bigger, stronger and can transform into a giant mech. Thats why I argue we should split it, though we could have a page devoted toward Biobliterators as a whole.

No Offense 1:26 PM August 14, 2013 (UTC)

  • Personally I don't see the point in splitting something up and using non-canon conjectural titles when we can just have a sub-section for the improved version. They both have the same name this is much simpler, more accurate and less confusing in my opinion. --Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 21:20, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

New Idea

Okay I have a better idea instead of splitting the article up. Lets keep this page, but have individual pages for the three types of Biobliterators, as they have vastly different functions from one another. The three individual pages will be referred to as Biobliterator (v1), Biobliterator (v2) and Biobliterator (interactive replica).

No Offense 10:00 AM May 2, 2014 (UTC)

  • I don't mind having a separate article for the "interactive replica" but I think the v1 and v2 should stay on one page with sub-headings. --HunterjHunterj's Resort 22:37, May 7, 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad we agree on the first point, but the first two Biobliterators (the ones UYA) should have separate articles, not share space on the same page. Except for a similar shape and ability to transform organic life into robots, the two versions are otherwise quite different from one another. In fact, the second Biobliterator is a actually a newer model than that of first Biobliterator (check the video at 1:13:10) Since the two Biobliterators are referred to as being of differing models from one another, they deserve their own respective pages.

No Offense 5:52 PM May 13, 2014 (UTC)